Third Party Commissioning Information Sheet

AID 1958768 · View on Simbli

Agenda Item

ii. Contract Renewal ~ RFP 24-752-037 ~ Third Party Commissioning Services ~ Total Systems Commissioning, Inc., TLC Engineering Solutions ~ Contract Renewal (1 of 4) (Not to exceed $2,000,000)

Summary: Presented by: Mr. Erick Hofstetter, Chief Operating Officer, Division of Operations
Request: It is requested that the DeKalb County Board of Education approve the first of four (1 of 4) contract renewals for RFP 24-752-037 Third Party Commissioning Services in the not-to-exceed amount of $2,000,000 to:


Total Systems Commissioning, Inc.
TLC Engineering Solutions (TLC)
Why: This request is to approve the contract renewal for the above firms to provide Third Party Commissioning Services throughout DeKalb County School District (“DCSD”) on an as-needed basis as required and directed, for various remodeling, renovations, life safety, maintenance and repair projects, for both E-SPLOST and Non-E-SPLOST projects.

This request extends the agreement for an additional year effective February 25, 2026, through February 24, 2027.
Details: On December 9, 2024, the Board of Education approved the award of contract RFP 24-752-037 for Third Party Commissioning Services on an as-needed basis for various remodeling, renovations, life safety, maintenance and repair projects, for E-SPLOST and Non-E-SPLOST projects for the Facilities/Maintenance Department and the E-SPLOST program. This recommendation is for the first of four (#1 of 4) one-year (1-year) contract renewal options.

Comprehensive information on Third Party Commissioning Services and their function is attached as an information sheet.

The scope of work for these services includes Third Party Commissioning Services. Additional project information can be found on the DeKalb County School District’s solicitation website at: https://dekalbschoolsga.ionwave.net/.

Total Systems Commissioning, Inc. is located at 2148 Hills Avenue NW, Suite I, Atlanta, GA 30318.
TLC Engineering Solutions is located at 4360 Chamblee Dunwoody Road, Suite 210, Atlanta, Georgia 30341.
Financial impact: It is anticipated that the cost for these services may exceed $100,000 within a fiscal year and will be allocated to various General Fund and E-SPLOST charge codes.

Purchasing Board Policy DJE III (C) (3) requires the Board of Education to approve the expenditure of any vendor that provides goods and/or services to the school system that may exceed $100,000 in purchases for the fiscal year. All single purchases over the $100,000 threshold will be presented to the Board for formal approval in accordance with Board policy.
Contact: Mr. Erick Hofstetter, Chief Operating Officer, Division of Operations, 678.676.1447
Mr. Hans Williams, Director of Planning & CIP Programming, Division of Operations, 678.676.1483
Effective: Upon Board Approval
Status: Approved by the Office of Legal Affairs
                                 One Sheet Explanation of:
                             COMMISSIONING SERVICES

The purpose of commissioning is to ensure that the Owner receives facilities and systems
that meet its design and operational requirements.
In current practice, Commissioning Services are provided by 3rd party Commissioning
Agents. (Abbreviated CxA in general and BECxA for Building Envelopes.) The simultaneous
commissioning of mechanical systems and the building envelope is known as “Total
Commissioning”.
Buildings that are properly commissioned typically have fewer change orders, tend to be
more energy efficient, and have lower operating and maintenance costs.
In theory, 3 rd party commissioning should not be required, as the Architect or Engineer
(Designer) of record is both responsible and liable for ensuring that the owner's
requirements are met in in the design, construction and turnover of the facility.
The extent to which the Designer verifies that the owner's requirements have been met
before the facility is handed over is unfortunately a function of time and money. In trying to
remain competitive, the Designer must gauge the level of risk his or her firm is willing to
accept by limiting their own commissioning activities. Most often, the decision made is to
“wait and see”, then pay for repairs. That approach, however, often results in failures that
are not immediately apparent and repairs that are not permanent. In either case, the owner
must spend considerable time and effort in managing, negotiating, and compensating for
operational deficiencies until the deficiency is diagnosed and corrected.
The use of a 3 party CxA serves six purposes:
              rd

   •   It engages a specialist practitioner that is well versed in the typical design failures
       that result in warranty issues, so that they may be eliminated inexpensively during
       design and construction.
   •   It provides for peer review of the design so that areas of concern may be discussed
       from the combined perspectives of the designer and future maintainer.
   •   It verifies that systems are designed to meet the Owner’s needs, and that they are
       installed as designed and working correctly at building delivery.
   •   It avoids the potential conflict of interest situation of the Designer having to
       establish whether any failures that may emerge are related to the design or to the
       installation/construction of the design.
   •   It provides a benchmark of building performance to facilitate future operations,
       maintenance, and recommissioning.

   •   It provides for lower overall life‐cycle costs for the Owner.
A properly executed commissioning program begins with clearly stated Owner’s Project
Requirements and then engages the Owner, the Designers, the construction manager, the
specialist sub‐contractors and the CxA to identify and prevent potential problems from
developing.
The initial cost of commissioning depends more on the complexity of the building design
than on its size. For ‘typical’ building projects, the anticipated cost of total building
commissioning is approximately 1% (+/‐ .5%) of the cost of     1 construction.

Nationwide, it is generally agreed that Total Building Commissioning generates a three‐
year simple payback on industry-standard fees.
Once a building is operational, systems begin to wear. Recommissioning is normally
performed every three to five years to maintain top levels of building performance and
after any significant building changes to identify new opportunities for improvement. 2
During recommissioning, the building operating and maintenance systems are examined
and cleaned as needed, parts may be fixed or replaced, and systems reset as if they were
being installed new.


                                                   END




1 APPA, US General Services Administration (GSA), and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) all recommend

budgeting between 0.5% and 1.5% of construction cost for CxA services, depending on building specifics and
complexity. The National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) advises 0.3% to 1.0% of project budget for
BECx services. The National Association of State Facilities Administrators (NASFA) recommends budgeting
1.25% to 2.25% of Construction Cost for Total Building Commissioning (CxA + BECx)
2 The actual interval is adjusted to ensure that there is always a positive return on investment for the

delivered services.

                                                     2