One Page Explanation of Commissioning

AID 1719300 · View on Simbli

Agenda Item

ix. Contract Award and Budget Reallocation ~ RFP No. 24-752-037~Third Party Commissioning Services ~Total Systems Commissioning, Inc., and TLC Engineering Solutions (Not to exceed $642,185.50)

Summary: Presented by: Mr. Erick Hofstetter, Chief Operating Officer, Division of Operations
Request: It is requested that the DeKalb County Board of Education (“the Board”):

Approve the Contract Award of RFP 24-752-037 for Third Party Commissioning Services to Total Systems Commissioning, Inc. ($359,727.50) and TLC engineering Solutions ($282,458.00) for a total Contract award in the Not to Exceed amount of $642,185.50.



Additionally, it is requested that the Board approve a budget reallocation in the amount of $401,901.50 from Program Contingency to fund the Third Party Commissioning Services project as follows:

Cross Keys HS - $119,443.50
Champion Theme Middle School $171,204
Nancy Creek Elementary School- $111,254
Why: Approval of the lump sum contract award of Third-party Commissioning Services to Total Systems Commissioning and TLC Engineering in the not to exceed amount of $642,185.50 along with a budget reallocation in the amount of $401,901.50 from Program Contingency will allow the proper funds to be allocated to the necessary project cost codes for the services to be provided.

The approval of this contract award meets Strategic Goal Area 6: Organizational Excellence.
Details: Specific details regarding the scope of work for this Request for Proposal (“RFP”) for Third Party Commissioning Services can be found on the DeKalb County School District’s solicitation website at https://dekalbschoolsga.ionwave.net/.

Comprehensive information on Third Party Commissioning Services and their function is attached as an information sheet.

The RFP was issued on June 27, 2024, and proposals were received from seven (7) firms on August 8, 2024. Four (4) firms were deemed responsive and evaluated by a selection committee. Two firms were selected, and this recommendation is based on the evaluations.

Total Systems Commissioning, Inc. and TLC Engineering Solutions will be responsible for the commissioning work as set forth in the solicitation documents.

Total Systems Commissioning, Inc. is located at 2148 Hills Avenue NW, Suite I, Atlanta, GA 30318.
TLC Engineering Solutions is located at 4360 Chamblee Dunwoody Road, Suite 210, Atlanta, Georgia 30341.
Financial impact: Third Party Commissioning Services for Dresden Elementary will be funded by E-SPLOST VI Project 21836. A budget of $90,805 will be created in the construction services cost code SP6CIP.21836.CONSTRSVC under the voter-approved E-SPLOST VI program.

The total budget of $90,805 for Third Party Commissioning Services for Dresden Elementary School will be allocated from cost SP6CIP.21836.CONSTRSVC, under the voter-approved E-SPLOST VI program.

The total budget of $119,443.50 for Third Party Commissioning Services for Cross Keys HS will be allocated from cost code, SP6CIP.21836.CONSTRSVC, under the voter-approved E-SPLOST V program.

Third Party Commissioning Services for Sequoyah MS/HS will be funded by E-SPLOST VI Project 10136. If approved, a budget of $149,479 will be created in the construction services cost code SP6NEWSCH.10136.CONSTRSVC under the voter-approved E-SPLOST VI program.
The total budget of $149,479 for Third Party Commissioning Services for Sequoyah MS/HS will be allocated from cost code SP6NEWSCH.10136.CONSTRSVC under the voter-approved E-SPLOST Vi program.

The total budget for Third Party Commissioning of $171,204 for Third Party Commissioning Services for Champion Theme Middle School will be allocated from cost code SP5FACCON.35835.CONSTRSVC under the voter-approved E-SPLOST V program.

The total budget of $111,254.00 for Third Party Commissioning Services for Nancy Creek Facility will be allocated from cost code SP5FACCON.35335.CONSTRSVC under the voter-approved E-SPLOST V program.

A budget reallocation of $401,901.50 from Program Contingency is requested to fund this contract award.
Contact: Mr. Erick Hofstetter, Chief Operating Officer, Division of Operations, 678.676.1447
Mr. Richard Boyd, Director of Design and Construction, Division of Operations, 678.676.1483
Effective: Upon Board Approval and fully executed contract documents
Status: Approved by the Office of Legal Affairs
                                 One Sheet Explanation of:
                             COMMISSIONING SERVICES

The purpose of commissioning is to ensure that the Owner receives facilities and systems
that meet its design and operational requirements.
In current practice, Commissioning Services are provided by 3rd party Commissioning
Agents. (Abbreviated CxA in general and BECxA for Building Envelopes.) The simultaneous
commissioning of mechanical systems and the building envelope is known as “Total
Commissioning”.
Buildings that are properly commissioned typically have fewer change orders, tend to be
more energy efficient, and have lower operating and maintenance costs.
In theory, 3 rd party commissioning should not be required, as the Architect or Engineer
(Designer) of record is both responsible and liable for ensuring that the owner's
requirements are met in in the design, construction and turnover of the facility.
The extent to which the Designer verifies that the owner's requirements have been met
before the facility is handed over is unfortunately a function of time and money. In trying to
remain competitive, the Designer must gauge the level of risk his or her firm is willing to
accept by limiting their own commissioning activities. Most often, the decision made is to
“wait and see”, then pay for repairs. That approach, however, often results in failures that
are not immediately apparent and repairs that are not permanent. In either case, the owner
must spend considerable time and effort in managing, negotiating, and compensating for
operational deficiencies until the deficiency is diagnosed and corrected.
The use of a 3 party CxA serves six purposes:
              rd

   •   It engages a specialist practitioner that is well versed in the typical design failures
       that result in warranty issues, so that they may be eliminated inexpensively during
       design and construction.
   •   It provides for peer review of the design so that areas of concern may be discussed
       from the combined perspectives of the designer and future maintainer.
   •   It verifies that systems are designed to meet the Owner’s needs, and that they are
       installed as designed and working correctly at building delivery.
   •   It avoids the potential conflict of interest situation of the Designer having to
       establish whether any failures that may emerge are related to the design or to the
       installation/construction of the design.
   •   It provides a benchmark of building performance to facilitate future operations,
       maintenance, and recommissioning.

   •   It provides for lower overall life‐cycle costs for the Owner.
A properly executed commissioning program begins with clearly stated Owner’s Project
Requirements and then engages the Owner, the Designers, the construction manager, the
specialist sub‐contractors and the CxA to identify and prevent potential problems from
developing.
The initial cost of commissioning depends more on the complexity of the building design
than on its size. For ‘typical’ building projects, the anticipated cost of total building
commissioning is approximately 1% (+/‐ .5%) of the cost of     1 construction.

Nationwide, it is generally agreed that Total Building Commissioning generates a three‐
year simple payback on industry-standard fees.
Once a building is operational, systems begin to wear. Recommissioning is normally
performed every three to five years to maintain top levels of building performance and
after any significant building changes to identify new opportunities for improvement. 2
During recommissioning, the building operating and maintenance systems are examined
and cleaned as needed, parts may be fixed or replaced, and systems reset as if they were
being installed new.


                                                   END




1 APPA, US General Services Administration (GSA), and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) all recommend

budgeting between 0.5% and 1.5% of construction cost for CxA services, depending on building specifics and
complexity. The National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) advises 0.3% to 1.0% of project budget for
BECx services. The National Association of State Facilities Administrators (NASFA) recommends budgeting
1.25% to 2.25% of Construction Cost for Total Building Commissioning (CxA + BECx)
2 The actual interval is adjusted to ensure that there is always a positive return on investment for the

delivered services.

                                                     2