Agenda Item
a. Progress Update from Cognia - (Updated 08.22.2023)
Summary: Presented by: Dr. Sherry Everett, Director Strategic Planning, Division of Continuous Improvement
DeKalb County School District
Follow up Monitoring Review
School Board Retreat
August 23-24, 2023
Dr. Devon Q. Horton, Superintendent
Agenda
Update on Progress
• November 1-3, 2023
• Purpose of Monitoring Review
• Monitoring Review Structure
• On-site
• Interviews & Review of Evidence
• Q&A
Purpose of Monitoring Review
• The purpose of the follow-up Monitoring Review for
DeKalb County School District (DCSD) will focus on
DCSD progress toward addressing the Improvement
Priorities from the Monitoring Review in November
2022
• Narrative key findings
• Directives
Cognia Directives (Nov. 2022 Monitoring Review Report)
• Review and renew board member commitment to the vision and mission of the
DeKalb County School District and board member role and responsibility regarding
the overall success of the district and learning outcomes for all students.
• Engage in a thoughtful and reflective review of recent Board Self-Assessment results
to determine areas of focus and next steps.
• Examine current structures in place that support efficient and effective Board
operations.
• Ensure meetings are conducted following the prescribed procedures outlined in
Robert’s Rules of Order.
• Determine and commit to adhering to processes as outlined in the Board Handbook
when board members are not following policy or the principles of the district.
Next Steps – DeKalb County School District
• Complete the Institution Progress Report (IPR)
• Collaborate with Lead Evaluator
Lead Evaluator: Carmen Pough Banks-Introductory meeting on August 3, 2023
Three member Team- Carmen Pough Banks, Lashonda Flanders, and Jeff Langham
Review Date: November 1-3, 2023
• Develop the Monitoring Review Schedule
• Issue invitations to persons selected for individual interviews for the Monitoring Review. (Board
Members, Superintendent, Area Superintendents, Select Principals, Community Leaders)
• Determine stakeholders who will be interviewed remotely.
• Collaborate with the Lead Evaluator regarding evidence submission for the Monitoring Review
• Evidence/documentation – examples: video clips of Board Meetings, Board Policies, Proof of
Board Member participation in Board trainings/development, Board Handbook,
Accreditation Engagement Review Report in March 2022 & the Monitoring Review from
November 2022.
Artifact Index
Institution Progress Report (IPR)
• Introduction: In advance of the follow-up Monitoring Review, please provide
information that describes continuous improvement efforts within your institution that
are relevant to the progress of meeting the Cognia Performance Standards identified
within this report.
• Report on Areas for Improvement
Standard 1.5 The governing authority adheres to a code of ethics and functions
within defined roles and responsibilities
• District Response: Describe your institution’s progress in meeting the Cognia
Performance Standard identified within this report. Please include actions taken,
evidence of results, and plans for next steps in your response.
• Conclusion: Please provide any pertinent information regarding the institution’s
overall continuous improvement success.
Next Steps – Monitoring Review Team
• Conduct the Monitoring Review as an impartial, fact-finding review
• Prepare a written Monitoring Review Report
• Submits the report to Cognia for quality assurance review
• Cognia will
• Submit the Monitoring Review Report to the Global Commission if an
accreditation status change is recommended
• Submit to the district
Questions
Disrupting for Excellence!
Thank you!