Vendor Evaluation_CenturyLink

AID 1483323 · View on Simbli

Agenda Item

a. Disaster Recovery As A Service (DRaaS) Purchase Approval (in an amount not to exceed $700,000)

Summary: Presented by: Ms. Monika Davis, Chief Information Officer, Division of Information and Instructional Technology
Request: It is requested that the Board of Education approve the amended extension to RFP 17-487 Disaster Recovery As A Service (DRaaS) to CenturyLink Communications LLC (Lumen) and the purchase of Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) for the district, in an amount not to exceed $700,000.00.
Why: The purpose of this recommendation is to extend the current RFP 17-487 with CenturyLink Communications LLC (Lumen) for one year.
Details: After the initial board approval, the Information Technology Department and CenturyLink spent over six months performing deep discovery of the DCSD’s complex infrastructure and designing a unique plan for replication. An additional six months were spent on implementation and accomplishing the following milestones:



Link Established between 56 Marietta (DeKalb County School District) and 55 Marietta (CenturyLink)
AS400 Site established in Raleigh, North Carolina
AS400 Fail Over test successfully conducted
200 + Servers/Virtual Servers replicating to Sterling Virginia


During the 2018 - 2019 school year, Century Link and IT conducted 120 Business Continuity Planning/Business Impact Analysis Meetings that analyzed the financial, operational, reputational, and legal impacts a disaster might have on the district. The data from these meetings have been used to draft a business continuity plan for the district which will ultimately inform changes to our disaster recovery plan.

This solution currently replicates our entire data center.

The Division of Information and Instructional Technology is requesting an extension for one year. A recommendation for a bidding process in accordance with Board Policy DJE will be presented to the BOE by August 2023.
Financial impact: $700,000
100.1000.530000.00011.7600.9990.0308.070.0000
Contact: Ms. Monika Davis, Chief Information Officer, Division of Information and Instructional Technology, 678.676.1274
Effective: February 2023
Status: Approval by General Counsel
                                 DEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
                           VENDOR / CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION



Instructions: This form must be completed for all contract renewals, be factual and do not include unsubstantiated opinions.



Contractor Name: Contract Title and Number:                         CenturyLink Communications, LLC (Lumen)

Contract Term:           Contract Period: From: 2/23/2022          To:   2/22/2023


Contract Value: $700,000.00                       Department:
                                                  Division of Information and Instructional Technology

                                         DEFINITIONS OF PERFORMANCE RATINGS

        SATISFACTORY                  UNSATISFACTORY                             N/A                INSUFFICIENT
                                                                                                    INFORMATION TO
Meets contractual requirements.       Does not meet                                                 RATE
The actions taken by the contractor   contractual requirements,
appear or were satisfactory.          and recovery is not likely
                                      in a timely manner. The
.                                     contractor’s corrective
                                      actions appear or were
                                      ineffective.




                      PERFORMANCE RATING                                       COMMENTS (Attach additional sheets if necessary)



                                                 Satisfactory
Work performed in compliance with contract       Unsatisfactory
terms                                            N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate




                                               Satisfactory
Materials, supplies and equipment provided as  Unsatisfactory
required?                                      N/A
                                               Insufficient info. to rate




                                                            Page 1 of 3
                                                 Satisfactory
Staff availability                               Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                Satisfactory
Timeliness of work                               Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                Satisfactory
Staff professionalism                            Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                Satisfactory
                                                 Unsatisfactory
Customer service                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate




                                                 Satisfactory
Quality of work                                  Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                 Satisfactory
Communication and Accessibility                  Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                 Satisfactory
                                                 Unsatisfactory
Prompt and effective correction of situations
and conditions                                   N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate


Documentation records, receipts, invoices,
and computer-generated reports received in a     Satisfactory
timely manner and in compliance with             Unsatisfactory
contract specifications                          N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                  x Yes     No
Would you recommend using this firm again?
                                                (Explain)


                                                            Page 2 of 3
OVERALL ASSESSMENT                       Unsatisfactory       Satisfactory


Comments:


Name of Evaluator:       Gwen Brame                                                        Gwen Brame
                                                (Print)                                           (Signature)
             Title:      Manager III Information Technology                    Date: 11/29/2022



  FISCAL INFORMATION:

  Original Contract Value $ ________0_________________

  Dollar amount of increase (decrease) $ _________________________

  Percent of increase (decrease)__ _______ %

  Reason for increase (decrease) _____________________________________________________________________________


                  Project Scope (FY 2022 – 2023)                                        Timeline




      CIO Review

                                                                                  11/29/2022
                         Monika Davis
                              Signature                                             Date

                      Chief Information Officer
                                Title




                                                           Page 3 of 3