Vendor Eval EFG December 2022

AID 1472289 · View on Simbli

Agenda Item

a. Educational Funding Group, Inc. for E-Rate Consulting Services

Summary: Presented by: Ms. Monika Davis, Chief Information Officer, Division of Information and Instructional Technology
Request: It is requested that the Board of Education approves payment to Educational Funding Group, Inc. for E-rate consulting services at an amount not to exceed $280,000. This payment will cover payment for E-rate funding years 2018, 2020, 2021, and 2022 at a cost of $70,000 per year.
Details: The United States Congress passed a law authorizing the FCC to fund technologies for K-12 schools based on poverty level.

The program covers or has covered:


Category 1 (formerly Priority 1): Voice Services and transmission of internet access within educational buildings within the district
Category 2 (formerly Priority 2): Eligible equipment such as wireless access points, switches, routers, data cabling and UPSs


Educational Funding Group, Inc. has assisted DCSD with reimbursements from the Universal Administrative Services Company (USAC) totaling $13.4 million in E-Rate funding since Funding Year 2013 - 2014. Services provided include:


Forms Preparation (E-Rate Application and Forms on behalf of DCSD)
Competitive Bidding (Follows DCSD bidding practices)
Participation in SLD Review Process
Document Retention
E-Rate Compliance and Legal Matters (Keeps DCSD informed of FCC E-Rate rules and regulations)

Explanation of Past Due Payments

The cost for the E-Rate funding years for 2018 and 2020 was $70,000 each year. These expenditures did not require board approval as the spending threshold was $100,000 at that time. During this time period, it is important to note that DIIT experienced multiple changes in leadership and staffing which contributed to these payment gaps.

Once the board policy was amended in December 2021, the expenditure for E-rate funding year 2021 for $70,000 required board approval. However, once the vendor informed DIIT that previous invoices had not been paid, the division held this payment to thoroughly investigate all payments made to this vendor.

At this time, all invoices have been accounted for, and this payment will bring our account current through June 30, 2023.
Financial impact: $280,000 General Fund
Charge Code: 100.2800.530000.00011.7600.9990.0308.070.0000
Contact: Ms. Monika Davis, Chief Information Officer, Division of Information and Instructional Technology, 678.676.1274
Effective: Upon Board Approval
Status: Approved by GDCR
                                 DEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
                           VENDOR / CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION



Instructions: This form must be completed for all contract renewals, be factual and do not include unsubstantiated opinions.



Contractor Name: Contract Title and Number:        EFG              Educational Funding Group, Inc.

Contract Term:           Contract Period: From: 12/1/2021          To:    11/30/22


Contract Value: $70,000.00                        Department:
                                                  Information Technology

                                         DEFINITIONS OF PERFORMANCE RATINGS

        SATISFACTORY                  UNSATISFACTORY                                 N/A              INSUFFICIENT
                                                                                                      INFORMATION TO
Meets contractual requirements.       Does not meet                                                   RATE
The actions taken by the contractor   contractual requirements,
appear or were satisfactory.          and recovery is not likely
                                      in a timely manner. The
.                                     contractor’s corrective
                                      actions appear or were
                                      ineffective.




                      PERFORMANCE RATING                                        COMMENTS (Attach additional sheets if necessary)



                                                 Satisfactory
Work performed in compliance with contract       Unsatisfactory
terms                                            N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate




                                                 Satisfactory
Materials, supplies and equipment provided as    Unsatisfactory
required?                                        N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate




                                                            Page 1 of 3
                                                 Satisfactory
Staff availability                               Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                Satisfactory
Timeliness of work                               Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                Satisfactory
Staff professionalism                            Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                Satisfactory
                                                 Unsatisfactory
Customer service                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate




                                                 Satisfactory
Quality of work                                  Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                 Satisfactory
Communication and Accessibility                  Unsatisfactory
                                                 N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                 Satisfactory
                                                 Unsatisfactory
Prompt and effective correction of situations
and conditions                                   N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate


Documentation records, receipts, invoices and
computer-generated reports received in a         Satisfactory
timely manner and in compliance with             Unsatisfactory
contract specifications                          N/A
                                                 Insufficient info. to rate



                                                  x Yes     No
Would you recommend using this firm again?
                                                (Explain)


                                                            Page 2 of 3
 OVERALL ASSESSMENT                        Unsatisfactory    Satisfactory


 Comments:

Zayo: works to resolve issues and bill the companies responsible for causing DCSD fiber breaks. Zayo works around the clock to make sure
that the DCSD Network is up and running and works to minimize downtime for DCSD Students and staff.


 Name of Evaluator:                     Gwen Brame                                            Gwen Brame
                                                (Print)                                          (Signature)
               Title:      ________Manager III Information Technology____________________Date: 11/21/2022




    FISCAL INFORMATION:

    Original Contract Value $ ________0_________________

    Dollar amount of increase (decrease) $ _________________________

    Percent of increase (decrease)__ _______ %

    Reason for increase (decrease) _____________________________________________________________________________


                    Project Scope (FY 2021 – 2022)                                             Timeline




       CIO Review


                           Monika Davis                                                  11/21/2022
                                Signature                                                  Date

                        Chief Information Officer
                                  Title




                                                             Page 3 of 3